토익스피킹, 유형을 알면 점수가 나와요
Q1 지문 읽기부터 Q11 의견 말하기까지 유형별 공략과 문제 뱅크, 60초 템플릿을 전부 무료로 공개합니다. 등급 표기는 ACTFL 체계(IH·AL)를 따라요.
교재 전체가 무료예요
1시험 이해
2유형별 공략
- Part 1 · Q1~2 낭독 (Read Aloud) · 기본 · 고득점준비 45초 / 낭독 45초. 발음·강세·억양·연음·끊어읽기를 평가.
- Part 1 · Q3~4 사진 묘사 (Describe a Picture) · 기본 · 고득점준비 45초 / 묘사 30초. 컬러 사진 1장을 구조적으로 묘사. 어휘·문법·묘사의 양과 조직을 평가.
- Part 1 · Q5~7 질의응답 (Respond to Questions) · 기본 · 고득점준비 3초 / 답변 15초(Q5·6)·30초(Q7). 일상·업무 주제 인터뷰형 질문에 즉답. 순발력·완결성 평가.
- Part 1 · Q8~10 정보기반 응답 (Respond Using Information) · 기본 · 고득점자료(일정표·안내문·이력서 등) 45초 읽기 → 질문에 자료 근거로 응답. 15초(Q8·9)·30초(Q10). 자료를 정확히 인용하는 능력 평가.
- Part 1 · Q11 의견 제시 (Express an Opinion) · 기본 · 고득점준비 45초 / 답변 60초. 최고 배점 문항, 여기서 Level이 갈린다. 처음 보는 주제에 논리적 의견을 60초간.
3문제 뱅크
- Part 1+ · Q11 의견 주제 뱅크 (Opinion Topic Bank) · 기본 · 고득점최고 배점 Q11 실전 대비. 빈출 12주제를 기본(IH)과 고득점(AL 이상) 두 버전 모범답안으로. 60초 5단 템플릿(Q11 의견 제시) 적용.
- Part 1+ · Q3~4 사진 묘사 실전 뱅크 (Picture Bank) · 기본 · 고득점빈출 장면 8종을 기본(IH)과 고득점(AL 이상) 두 버전 묘사로. 5슬롯 템플릿(Q3~4 사진 묘사) 적용. 사진은 실물 대신 장면 설정을 글로 제시하고, 그 장면을 묘사하는 원본 스크립트.
- Part 1+ · Q5~7 질의응답 실전 뱅크 (Respond Topic Bank) · 기본 · 고득점빈출 주제 8세트를 Q5·6(15초)·Q7(30초) 3문항 구성으로. 각 답변 기본·고득점 두 버전. 즉답 템플릿(Q5~7 질의응답) 적용.
- Part 1+ · Q1~2 낭독 지문 뱅크 (Read-Aloud Passage Bank)빈출 3유형(안내방송·광고·소개멘트) 낭독 지문 9편 + 전달 설계(강세·청킹·억양·연음).
- Part 1+ · Q8~10 정보응답 자료 뱅크 (Info Bank) · 기본 · 고득점정보응답 빈출 자료 3종(출장 일정·이력서·행사 안내)을 Q8/9/10 세트로. 각 답변 기본·고득점 두 버전. 응답 템플릿(Q8~10 정보기반 응답) 적용.
4템플릿·전달력
Q11 의견 문항 뱅크
회사가 직원 교육에 투자해야 하는가?
모범답안 보기
I completely agree that companies should invest in training their employees, and I see it as a win-win. First and foremost, well-trained staff are simply more productive and make fewer costly mistakes, which directly benefits the company's bottom line. On top of that, investing in people sends a powerful message — that the company values their growth — and that dramatically improves loyalty and retention. For example, a friend of mine turned down a higher-paying offer precisely because his company kept investing in his development. Admittedly, training costs money upfront, but the long-term payoff in skill and loyalty far outweighs it. So that's why I strongly support it.
모범답안 듣기젊은 직원과 경력 직원 중 누가 더 가치 있는가?
모범답안 보기
Honestly, I don't think it's either-or, but if I had to choose, I'd lean toward experienced employees. The main reason is that experience brings judgment you simply can't teach — knowing how to handle a crisis, read a client, avoid past mistakes. What's more, experienced staff often mentor the younger ones, multiplying their value across the team. Of course, younger employees bring fresh energy and new ideas, and the ideal team blends both — but when it comes to steering through tough situations, I'd put my money on experience every time.
모범답안 듣기온라인 수업 vs 대면 수업
모범답안 보기
Personally, I still prefer face-to-face classes, even though online learning is convenient. The biggest reason is focus — in a physical classroom, there's an accountability that my living room simply doesn't have; at home I'm one notification away from losing an hour. On top of that, in-person classes make interaction effortless — you can ask a question the moment it comes up and read the room. For instance, whenever I take online courses, I catch myself multitasking and retaining almost nothing. Granted, online learning wins on flexibility, but for actually absorbing material, nothing beats being physically present. So that's my clear preference.
모범답안 듣기학생들이 취업에 도움 되는 실용 과목을 더 배워야 하는가?
모범답안 보기
I firmly believe schools should put more emphasis on practical, job-ready skills. First, many graduates enter the workforce knowing theory but struggling with basics like communication, budgeting, or teamwork. Secondly, practical skills level the playing field — they help students who don't go on to graduate school still thrive. A good example is financial literacy; almost no one is taught it, yet everyone needs it. That said, I wouldn't scrap academic subjects entirely — they build critical thinking — but the balance should tilt more toward the practical. So all things considered, I'm strongly in favor.
모범답안 듣기스마트폰이 소통에 이로운가 해로운가
모범답안 보기
I think smartphones are a double-edged sword, but on balance, I'd say they've hurt genuine communication more than helped it. On the positive side, they let us stay connected across any distance instantly. However, that convenience comes at a cost — people increasingly text instead of talk, and face-to-face conversations suffer as everyone glances at their screens. For example, I've sat at dinners where the whole table was silent, everyone scrolling. Of course, the technology itself isn't evil, and used wisely it's incredible — but left unchecked, it quietly erodes the deeper connection that real conversation builds. That's my honest take.
모범답안 듣기SNS가 사회에 긍정적인가?
모범답안 보기
I have genuinely mixed feelings, but if pushed, I'd say social media does more harm than good in its current form. My first concern is mental health — the constant highlight reels fuel comparison and anxiety, especially among young people. Secondly, misinformation spreads faster than facts, and that has real consequences for society. For instance, we've all seen how quickly a false rumor can go viral before the truth catches up. Now, to be fair, social media has undeniably connected people and given a voice to the voiceless — so it's not all bad — but until the downsides are better managed, I remain cautious. That's where I land.
모범답안 듣기기술 발전이 일자리를 늘리는가 줄이는가?
모범답안 보기
This is a tough one, but I'm cautiously optimistic that technology creates more opportunity than it destroys — eventually. In the short term, automation clearly displaces certain jobs, and that pain is real. However, history suggests that new technology also generates entirely new industries nobody could have predicted. Take the internet — it wiped out some roles but created millions of others. Admittedly, the transition is painful and uneven, and we need to support the people caught in it — but over the long run, I believe innovation expands the pie rather than shrinking it.
모범답안 듣기온라인 쇼핑 vs 오프라인 쇼핑
모범답안 보기
I'll admit I do most of my shopping online now, so I have to give the edge to online shopping. The main reason is convenience — I can compare prices and order anything at midnight without leaving my couch. On top of that, it's often cheaper, since online stores skip the overhead of physical space. For example, I furnished half my apartment online for far less than in-store prices. That said, for things like clothes, I still value trying them on — so I'm not fully one-sided — but for sheer efficiency and value, online wins for me.
모범답안 듣기돈을 저축하는 것과 경험에 쓰는 것 중 무엇이 중요한가?
모범답안 보기
While saving matters, I lean toward spending on meaningful experiences, at least while you're young. The reason is that experiences — travel, learning, time with people — shape who you become in a way a bank balance never will. What's more, memories appreciate over time, whereas most possessions lose their shine. For instance, I barely remember things I've bought, but I vividly recall every trip I took. Of course, financial security is essential and I'm not saying be reckless — but hoarding every won while missing life's experiences is its own kind of poverty. So that's my stance.
모범답안 듣기대도시에 사는 것과 소도시에 사는 것 중 무엇이 나은가?
모범답안 보기
Personally, I'd choose a big city, though I understand the appeal of quieter places. First, big cities offer far more opportunity — jobs, culture, food, people — everything is within reach. Secondly, the sheer convenience is hard to give up once you're used to it; everything's open late and a subway ride away. For example, I can see a concert, try a new cuisine, and meet friends all in one evening here. Granted, big cities are expensive and stressful, and small towns win on peace and cost — but for this stage of my life, the energy and options of a big city are worth the trade-offs.
모범답안 듣기회사가 직원의 워라밸(일과 삶의 균형)을 보장해야 하는가?
모범답안 보기
I strongly believe companies should actively protect their employees' work-life balance. First and foremost, rested employees are more creative and productive — burnout helps no one, least of all the company. Secondly, respecting personal time builds loyalty; people stay where they're treated like humans, not machines. For instance, companies known for good balance consistently attract the best talent. Some might argue it hurts short-term output — but I'd counter that sustainable performance beats short bursts followed by burnout. So I'm firmly on the side of protecting balance.
모범답안 듣기
토익스피킹 멱살캐리완주단, 준비 중이에요
교재로 혼자 하는 게 어렵다면, 매일 멱살 잡고 완주까지 같이 가는 집중반을 준비하고 있어요. 관심 등록을 남기면 열릴 때 가장 먼저 알려드려요.
오늘의 발음으로 매일 입을 열어요
시험 준비의 기본기는 매일 소리 내는 습관이에요.